So here's the thing,
This year's film festival starts tomorrow, so I really should get around to posting my comments on the films I saw during the 2014 film festival. These comments were all originally posted on Facebook within a couple of days of seeing each film, so they reflect my initial thoughts and responses while each film was still fresh in my mind. They were also all written in something of a rush, so are not the most eloquent pieces of writing. Looking at the list of films, it's astonishing how so many of these screenings feel like they took place just a couple of months ago, while there are other films that feel like they occurred years and years ago.
[Comments on 29 films follow after the jump]
23 July, 2015
05 July, 2015
Power of suspense, laughter, violence, hope, heart, nudity, sex, happy endings... mainly happy endings
So here's the thing,
* The Lobster
If you had gone past the Paramount Cinema at 5.30 on
Wednesday morning, you would have seen a solitary figure standing outside in
the cold. After the disaster that the film festival online ticket bookings had
been last year, I was concerned that a lot of people might revert back to
booking in person, just in case, and I was determined to get in front. I
needn’t have worried. It was over an hour before a second person turned up, and
another 30 minutes before the next person arrived. Eventually, we were let in at 9am and tickets went on sale.
And things seemed to go well with the system. Until...
We were booking my last day of films, just four films remaining to
process. And suddenly the ticket agent’s screen froze. And remained frozen. I
had to wait 15 or 20 minutes until the system reconnected, at which point my
entire order had been lost. So we had to start again from scratch. It was now
9.40am. Unfortunately, for a few of the busiest screenings, I’d lost the very good
seats I’d initially secured, but I still don’t have any bad seats by any means.
On the whole, it worked.
But I’m thinking about taking a chance with not queueing next
year. While they still seem to have some issues with the booking system not
coping with the demand, it seems that things are much improved from last year,
and (one would hope) should be even better next year. And now that the online
system allows the user to make seat selections, that’s the last advantage of
in-person booking gone. And so much of the in-person booking time was occupied
with searching for the films I’d selected, before we even got to picking seats,
that it would have been faster had I been able to just use my pre-compiled
wishlist of film; I could have just selected them all and been choosing my
seats within a minute. I might have been able to complete the transaction before the system went down. (And not having to get up at 4.30 in the morning would be nice.)
So I return to my car to drive to work. Except that there’s
a car parked next to me. The problem is that the space next to me is nowhere
near wide enough to fit a car; it’s usually used by motorcycles. So, in order
for this car to squeeze into the park, they had left about 20cm space between
their passenger side and my driver’s side. Obviously there’s no possible way
anyone, no matter how small, could get into my car. After a moment of panic, I
realise my church is just down the road. So I wander down to the office to ask
whether anyone there can help me; I was imagining us trying to push the car
into the road so that I could get in. Fortunately one of the people who came to
help realised that he could climb into the driver’s seat from the passenger
side, and was therefore able to drive it out.
So here are the films I’m seeing this year:
* The Lobster
* Girlhood
* Phoenix
* Victoria
* '71
* 99 Homes
* Dope
* Lonesome
I’m most excited about Inherent Vice. I’ve loved Paul Thomas
Anderson’s films ever since I saw Magnolia at the 2000 film festival, and was
bitterly disappointed when the release of his new film was cancelled two weeks
before its scheduled release date. I know that the Paramount had tried to
negotiate with the distributor for a limited release to that cinema, but that
also fell through. Fortunately, the festival will offer an opportunity to see
the film, and at the Embassy, which is a great relief. Everything I'd seen of the film looked remarkable and visually distinctive, so I was not looking
forward to only ever experiencing the film on my TV screen.
I’ve heard excellent things about the shot-in-California Iranian
black-and-white vampire film A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night, and while it has
been sitting in my Netflix streaming queue for a couple of months, I’m held off
on watching it in the hope it would get a festival screening. So I’m excited to
see that.
I’m also really looking forward to Victoria, which is
supposed to be great. A crime thriller about a girl who falls in with some guys
planning to rob a bank, it’s apparently an intense and thrilling experience,
and that’s before you take into account the technical feat of filming the
entire 140 minute movie as a genuine single take. (None of the Birdman-style
fakery piecing separate takes together to create the illusion of a single take;
they apparently really did shoot it with one camera over a 2 hour 20 time
period.) Consider Russian Ark, which is probably the most famous single-take
film. That film was a brilliant film and technically an impressive achievement,
but it took place in a single (admittedly
large) location that could be controlled, and while it was enjoyable and had
memorable sequences, it was also a bit impregnable if you don’t have a strong
grasp on Russian history (which I don’t). By contrast, Victoria takes place
over 22 separate locations, wandering the streets between each location, plus
it’s almost twice as long as Russian Ark, and it should have the easy audience accessibility
and pure entertainment value that comes with working in the defined crime genre.
If they really have managed to pull this off, the film could be something quite
special.
There’s a small selection of classic films this year. I saw
The Colour of Pomegranates at the film society a few years ago, and did not
care for it, so I’m not seeing that. However, I’ve never seen either of the
other classic films; The Misfits (the final film of both Marilyn Monroe and
Clark Gable), or Kiss Me Kate (a musical adaptation of The Taming of the Shrew,
in Technicolor 3D). Both of those should be fun.
There’s one film I’m seeing about which I’m deliberately
trying to stay ignorant. I heard the festival director, Bill Gosden, on Radio
NZ’s “At the Movies” show mention The Tribe, a film apparently about a gang of
teenage delinquents. What Gosden said was that the characters are all hearing-impaired,
the dialogue is therefore all in Ukrainian Sign Language, and that the director
believes that the sign language is so expressive that you don't need subtitles.
So there are no subtitles in the film. Frankly, that intrigues me as an
experience and an experiment; can I follow the film if I have no idea what
anyone is saying? So I’ve decided to not know anything else about the film
until I sit down in the cinema, and try to experience the film in as pure a way
as possible.
There’s also a couple of documentaries that I fully expect
to be difficult and challenging to watch, but that are also supposed to be
excellent. The first, The Look of Silence, is a companion piece to The Act of
Killing, an incredible and disturbing documentary that I saw in the 2013
festival. That film looked at the Indonesian killings in the mid-60s, when a
million alleged-communists were murdered, and was strongly focused on the
killers, showing them recreating the techniques they would use to murder their
victims. The new film is apparently more focussed on the victims, with the
central character being an optomistrist offering free eye checks to members of
these death squads as an opening to discuss their crimes, including the murder
of his own brother. There’s also a film called Dreamcatcher about a woman called
Brenda Myers-Powell, who spent 25 years as a prostitute (starting when she was
just 14), but who is now working to help sex workers leave the life. (There’s a
really interesting (albeit disturbing) interview with Myers-Powell here)
I’ve decided to trust the decisions of the festival
programmers where it comes to the “big night” films. I’ve had too many times
where I’ve decided not to see an opening night, centerpiece, or closing night
film because it didn’t interest me, only to discover later on that I really
loved those films. So even though they don’t immediately interest me, I’m still
going to see The Lobster (about a society where people who are turned into
animals if they remain single for too long?) or Tale of Tales (about, umm, I
genuinely don’t know) just because. (On the other hand, the centrepiece film, a
Taiwanese movie called The Assassin, actually does seem pretty interesting.)
A couple of years ago, the festival show the Koreeda
Hirokazu film I Wish, about two brothers wanting to be reunited, which everyone
I heard from really loved. Unfortunately it just kept clashing for me with
other priorities, so I never got to see it. (And still haven’t.) Then there was
the swapped-at-birth film Like Father, Like Son. Which I also wanted to see,
but which kept clashing. So this year, I decided to make his new film, Our
Little Sister (about girls meeting their half-sister) an absolute priority. And
I’ve managed to fit it in; I am risking a rather short turn-around between two
films and different cinemas, but it should be achievable.
One thing I always find a little disappointing is the way
Wellington has often been shortchanged with the Live Cinema events, where
classic silent films are accompanied by live musical performances. Auckland
always seems to get the big films, while we get the lesser-known films. So this
year, both Auckland and Wellington are getting a film I’ve never heard of
called Lonesome. I’m sure it’s a great film, and it’s nice to be able to see a
film I might otherwise never get to see, and the music will be great. But then
I look at my wall, and see the big picture of Charlie Chaplin with “the kid”, and
I realise that Auckland is also getting a Live Cinema screening of The Kid, and
I wind up feeling like I’m missing out. And that’s disappointing. Sure, it’s
not exactly hard for me to find a copy of The Kid to watch at home, but it
still feels like a lost opportunity.
There’s a ton of films I’ve just heard good things about and
am excited to see – Ex Machina, While We’re Young, Dope, Girlhood, The End of
the Tour, or The Wolfpack. As an animation fan, it will be sad to see When
Marnie Was There, which (following the retirement of Miyazaki and the likely
retirement of Takahata) could very well be the final film of the great Japanese
animation Studio Ghibli. And the rest of the films I’m seeing are just movies
that leapt out at me for one reason or another, and often I don’t really even
know why I feel compelled to see some of these films. But I’m optimistic; there
could be some real gems in there.
We’re now less than three weeks from the start of the
festival, and I find myself getting impatient, looking over the programme again
and again, wanting the festival to have started already. And in five weeks’ time, it will all be over
for another year. And so to next year...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)